venda-se!

Um blogue de ensaio e erro sobre Economia.

Contacto

aputadasubjectividade
Pop Chula
buzina

16.6.03

Dívida Odiosa II

Richard Perle, the influential neo-conservative thinker, has put forward the idea that Iraqi debt should be cancelled, because this would punish bankers for lending to a "vicious dictatorship". This, astonishingly, puts him in the same camp as bleeding-heart liberals and radical anti-globalisers. But these extremes agree on a policy that is both unworkable and unnecessary.(...)
The idea that the debt of illegitimate regimes should be unenforceable is, at first glance, attractive. Lenders would know that loans to tyrants are un-enforceable. They would then either refuse to make the loans or impose costlier terms. Yet this idea is also unworkable. The difficulty lies in determining who judges whether a regime is illegitimate and on what criteria.
The US itself has happily watched international lending to Chile under Augusto Pinochet, to the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos and to South Korea under Park Chung Hee. It could, of course, propound the simple principle that loans to tyrannies it dislikes should be unenforceable and vice versa. But the chances that this notion would be accepted by the rest of the world are smaller than Mr Perle may think they ought to be.
If the notion of odious debt were to be made the basis of a predictable and transparent international regime, the determination of a government's legitimacy would, instead, have to be handed over - Oh horrors! - to a multilateral organisation. There would have to be a sanctions regime under United Nations auspices. Even so, the principle could not be applied to loans made before the sanctions came into effect, as is now proposed for Iraq.(...)
Since Iraq's leading creditors are the Gulf states, Russia, Japan and the commercial banks, the bigger the cut in debt the more these opponents of the overthrow of Saddam Hussein will be punished. Mr Perle is dressing up US self-interest in the garb of morality. But the US should not pursue the idea of odious debt, since the precedent is certain to come back to haunt it. It should focus, instead, on obtaining the debt relief Iraq now needs.